1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 592 F.Supp.
  5. 592 F.Supp. 592 (1984)
 

STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT BD. v. FLUOR CORP.

No. 76 Civ. 2135 (RWS).

592 F.Supp. 592 (1984)

STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT BOARD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FLUOR CORPORATION and Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

August 23, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Schwartz, Shapiro, Kelm & Warren, Columbus, Ohio, for plaintiffs; Russell A. Kelm, Columbus, Ohio of counsel.

Cahill, Gordon & Reindel by Raymond L. Falls, Charles A. Gilman, Joseph I. Loonan, Julie A. Petruzzelli, New York City, for defendant Fluor Corp.

Kelley, Drye & Warren, New York City, for defendant Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company; Richard J. Concannon, Robert E. Crotty, Kevin J. Walsh, New York City, of counsel.

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

State Teachers Retirement Bd. v. Fluor Corp. and Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co., once again has presented what appears to be a fresh question in securities law, ably presented by skilled and forceful advocates. Familiarity with the underlying factual situation is assumed. See State Teachers Retirement Bd. v. Fluor Corp., 654 F.2d 843 (2d Cir.1981).

The thorns of the dilemma...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases