1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 589 F.Supp.
  5. 589 F.Supp. 534 (1984)
 

E.E.O.C. v. PEAT, MARWICK, MITCHELL AND CO.

No. 83-2277C(2).

589 F.Supp. 534 (1984)

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Applicant, v. PEAT, MARWICK, MITCHELL AND CO., Respondent.

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri.

June 20, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James R. Neely, Robert B. Curtis, Donna L. Harper, St. Louis, Mo., for applicant.

Kohn, Shands, Elbert, Gianovlakis & Giljum, Alan C. Kohn, Mark J. Bremer, Linda Douglas Wuestner, St. Louis, Mo., for respondent.

MEMORANDUM

FILIPPINE, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court for a determination whether a subpoena duces tecum issued to respondent Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. ("Peat, Marwick") should be enforced.

On application by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC"), this Court ordered respondent to show cause why it should not be compelled to comply with the subpoena issued to it. The Court held a hearing on the matter on April...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases