1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 317 S.E.2d
  5. 317 S.E.2d 735 (1984)
 

STATE v. McCRIMMON

No. 8316SC1081.

317 S.E.2d 735 (1984)

STATE of North Carolina v. Darrell McCRIMMON.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

July 17, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Asst. Atty. Gen. Douglas A. Johnston, Raleigh, for the State.

Philip A. Diehl, Raeford, for defendant-appellant.

PHILLIPS, Judge.

Defendant's first contention is that the trial judge erred in permitting the District Attorney to ask two leading questions of its witness Robert McInnis. One of the questions complained of was not leading— "Did you at any time tell Detective Sims any lies about what happened that night?" Though the other question was leading— "So you told him the truth from the moment you were apprehended?"—it had no prejudicial effect on defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases