1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ill.
  4. 125 Ill.
  5. 125 Ill. App.3d 885 (1984)
 

PROCESS COLOR PLATE CO., INC. v. CHI. URBAN TRANS. DIST.

No. 83-900.

125 Ill. App.3d 885 (1984)

466 N.E.2d 1033

PROCESS COLOR PLATE COMPANY, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. CHICAGO URBAN TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT et al., Defendants-Appellee (Keck, Mahin & Cate, Petitioner-Appellant).

Appellate Court of Illinois — First District (1st Division).

Opinion filed June 25, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Keck, Mahin & Cate, of Chicago, pro se (John M. Betts, Donald G. Mulack, and Philip V. Martino, of counsel), for appellant.

Isham, Lincoln & Beale, of Chicago (A. Daniel Feldman, David Narefsky, and Charles J. Risch, of counsel), for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

JUSTICE CAMPBELL delivered the opinion of the court:

Petitioner, Keck, Mahin & Cate, a law firm, appeals from a trial court order denying the enforcement of petitioner's attorney's lien served upon the Chicago Urban Transportation District, a municipal corporation. On appeal petitioner raises the following issues: (1) whether the district interfered with contracts between petitioner and

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases