1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 566 F.Supp.
  5. 566 F.Supp. 342 (1983)
 

WEINBERGER v. PIEDMONT INDUSTRIES, INC.

No. 80 Civ. 5143 (JES).

566 F.Supp. 342 (1983)

Arthur H. WEINBERGER, Plaintiff, v. PIEDMONT INDUSTRIES, INC. RETIREMENT INCOME PLAN, and Martin L. Morrow, Arlene Morrow, E.F. Brent and William R. Jolly, individually and in their capacities as members of the Committee of the Piedmont Industries, Inc. Retirement Income Plan, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

July 8, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Burton H. Zuckerman, New York City, for plaintiff.

Willkie, Farr & Gallagher, New York City, for defendants; Robert J. Kheel, Gary W. Howell, New York City, of counsel.

OPINION AND ORDER

SPRIZZO, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Arthur Weinberger, a former employee of Piedmont Industries, Inc. ("Piedmont"), commenced this action against Piedmont Industries, Inc. Retirement Income Plan (the "Plan"), a qualified employee pension plan within the meaning of § 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 and an employee benefit plan within the meaning of § 3 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases