1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 574 F.Supp.
  5. 574 F.Supp. 300 (1983)
 

McPEEK v. DAYTON FORGING AND HEAT TREATING CO.

No. C-3-83-084.

574 F.Supp. 300 (1983)

Jack McPEEK, Plaintiff, v. DAYTON FORGING AND HEAT TREATING COMPANY, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, W.D.

August 26, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dwight Brannon, Michael Tucker, Dayton, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Thomas J. Harrington, Dayton, Ohio, Frederick G. Cloppert, Jr., Columbus, Ohio, for defendants.

DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO AMEND SUSTAINED; FURTHER PROCEDURES ORDERED OF COUNSEL

RICE, District Judge.

Plaintiff filed suit in this case on February 9, 1983, under § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA) of 1947, 29 U.S.C. § 185, against Defendants Dayton Forge and Heat Treating Company, the United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases