1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 187 N.J.
  5. 187 N.J. Super. 524 (1983)
 

STANO v. SOLDO CONSTR. CO.

187 N.J. Super. 524 (1983)

455 A.2d 541

EUGENE J. STANO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. SOLDO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF THE COUNTY OF WARREN AND ESTIMATE DESIGN SERVICE, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS. KEN-RAD CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF THE COUNTY OF WARREN, DEFENDANT, AND NPS CONTRACTORS, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. RAYMOND PETERS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF THE COUNTY OF WARREN, DEFENDANT, AND NPS CONSTRUCTORS, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 12, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard R. Bonamo argued the cause for appellant Soldo Construction Company (Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, attorneys; Richard R. Bonamo and Philip A. Pahigian, on the briefs).

Edward J. Frisch argued the cause for appellant NPS Constructors, Inc. (Lindabury, McCormick & Estabrook, attorneys; Edward J. Frisch and Craig N. Greenawalt on the briefs).

Craig N. Greenawalt argued the cause for appellant NPS Constructors, Inc. (Lindabury, McCormick & Estabrook, attorneys; Craig N. Greenawalt and Edward J. Frisch on the briefs).

Richard R. Bonamo argued the cause for respondent Raymond Peters (Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, attorneys; Richard R. Bonamo and Philip A. Pahigian on the briefs).

Robert E. Wade, Warren County Counsel, argued the cause for defendant Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Warren.

Stokes & Throckmorton, attorneys for respondent Ken-Rad Construction Co., Inc. (Edward C. Stokes, II on the brief).

Before Judges MATTHEWS, ANTELL and FRANCIS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by MATTHEWS, P.J.A.D.

The public contract involved in these consolidated appeals was originally awarded to appellant Soldo Construction Company. Plaintiff Stano, a principal for a subcontractor of the second highest bidder, challenged this award. The award was reversed because Soldo failed to provide a list of qualified subcontractors, as required by N.J.S.A. 40A:11-16.

The contract was re-awarded to defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases