1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 558 F.Supp.
  5. 558 F.Supp. 91 (1983)
 

BURRELL v. SWARTZ

No. 82 Civ. 2466.

558 F.Supp. 91 (1983)

William BURRELL, Plaintiff, v. Alice Justine SWARTZ and A.L. Luciano, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

February 24, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Burrell, plaintiff pro se.

Robert Abrams, New York State Atty. Gen., New York City, for defendants; George Perry, Asst. Atty. Gen., New York City, of counsel.

SOFAER, District Judge:

Plaintiff filed a pro se, in forma pauperis complaint alleging that defendant court reporters violated 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by making various errors and omissions in recording plaintiff's criminal trial in New York State Supreme Court. On April 28, 1982 this Court issued an order dismissing the complaint without prejudice pending resolution of plaintiff's state court motion to settle the transcript under C.P.L.R. 5525(c). Plaintiff subsequently...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases