1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 92 N.J.
  5. 92 N.J. 483 (1983)
 

SOUTH PLAINFIELD v. KENTILE FLOORS, INC.

92 N.J. 483 (1983)

457 A.2d 450

SOUTH PLAINFIELD BOROUGH, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. KENTILE FLOORS, INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. SOMERVILLE INDUSTRIAL PARK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. BOROUGH OF SOUTH PLAINFIELD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 16, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sanford E. Chernin argued the cause for appellant (Chernin & Freeman, attorneys).

D. Bruce Unger argued the cause for respondent Kentile Floors, Inc. (Hutt, Berkow, Hollander & Jankowski, attorneys).

Carl G. Weisenfeld argued the cause for respondent Somerville Industrial Park (Hannoch, Weisman, Stern, Besser, Berkowitz & Kinney, attorneys; Carl G. Weisenfeld and Todd M. Sahner, on the brief).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by POLLOCK, J.

These appeals require us to determine the applicability of N.J.S.A. 54:2-43, the Freeze Act, to a consent judgment entered by the Tax Court pursuant to a settlement. For the assessment year and the two succeeding years, the Act "freezes" municipal property assessments in disputed cases resolved by a final judgment of the Tax Court. In South Plainfield Borough v. Kentile Floors, Inc., one part of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases