1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 189 N.J.
  5. 189 N.J. Super. 368 (1983)
 

MANT v. GILLESPIE

189 N.J. Super. 368 (1983)

460 A.2d 172

LIONEL A. MANT, JR. AND KATHERINE D. MANT, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. FREDERICK S. GILLESPIE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 30, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John F. Bracaglia, Jr. argued the cause for appellants (Schachter, Wohl, Cohn & Trombadore, P.A., attorneys).

Leonard Rosenstein argued the cause for respondent (Feuerstein, Sachs & Maitlin, attorneys).

Before Judges BISCHOFF, COLEMAN and GAULKIN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by GAULKIN, J.A.D.

This case raises issues not previously addressed in our case law concerning the accrual, for limitations purposes, of a legal malpractice cause of action.

On February 26, 1981 plaintiffs Lionel A. Mant, Jr. and Katherine D. Mant (the Mants) filed this action against defendant Frederick S. Gillespie (Gillespie), their former attorney. Their complaint...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases