1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.Commw.
  4. 76 Pa.Commw.
  5. 76 Pa.Commw. 387 (1983)
 

HUNTINGDON, INC. ET AL. v. PA. P.U.C.

No. 311 C.D. 1982.

76 Pa.Commw. 387 (1983)

Huntingdon, Inc. and Ryland Homes, Inc., Petitioners v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, Respondent. Newtown Artesian Water Company, Intervenor.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

August 17, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard P. McBride, with him Herbert K. Sudfeld, Jr., McBride, Murphy & Sudfeld, for petitioners.

Velma A. Boozer, with her Robert P. Meehan, Assistant Counsel, Louise Russell Knight, Deputy Chief Counsel, and Charles F. Hoffman, Chief Counsel, for respondent.

Brenden E. Brett, with him D. Mark Thomas, Thomas & Thomas, for intervenor.

Argued April 6, 1983, before Judges WILLIAMS, JR., DOYLE and BARBIERI, sitting as a panel of three.

OPINION BY JUDGE DOYLE, August 17, 1983:

Huntingdon, Inc. and Ryland Homes, Inc. appeal an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) which directed it to pay a sum in the amount of $138,624.00 to the Newtown Artesian Water Company (Newtown) or suffer termination of water service to Huntingdon's residential development.

Huntingdon, Inc. (Huntingdon) is the developer of a seventy-nine acre residential development in Bucks County known as Sturbridge...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases