1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 189 N.J.
  5. 189 N.J. Super. 237 (1983)
 

GOTTHELF v. PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS

189 N.J. Super. 237 (1983)

459 A.2d 1198

PHILIP GOTTHELF AND PAULA GOODIS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC. AND THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, DEFENDANTS AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. WINDOW SYSTEMS, DE VAC OF NEW JERSEY, INC., DE VAC OF MINNEAPOLIS, INC. AND BURNS INTERNATIONAL SECURITY SERVICES, INC. (IMPLEADED AS BURNS DETECTIVE AGENCY), THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 6, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joel A. Drucker argued the cause for appellants.

Fred J. Theemling, Jr. argued the cause for respondents Property Management Systems, Inc. and Prudential Insurance Company of America (Peter J. Farabaugh, attorney; Fred J. Theemling of counsel and on the brief).

John J. Scanlon argued the cause for respondents Window Systems and De Vac of New Jersey, Inc. (Scanlon & Robinson, attorneys; Patrick A. Robinson on the statement in lieu of brief).

Linda A. Palazzolo argued the cause for respondent De Vac of Minneapolis, Inc. (Connell, Foley & Geiser, attorneys; Linda A. Palazzolo of counsel and on the brief).

Ralph A. De Sevo argued the cause for respondent Burns International Security Systems, Inc. (De Sevo, Cerutti & Lombardi, attorneys; Ralph A. De Sevo of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges MICHELS, PRESSLER and TRAUTWEIN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by MICHELS, P.J.A.D.

Plaintiffs Philip Gotthelf and Paula Goodis appeal from a judgment of the Law Division in favor of all defendants and third-party defendants. The trial judge granted the motions for judgment in favor of defendants and third-party defendants Window Systems, De Vac of New Jersey, Inc. and De Vac of Minneapolis, Inc. at the conclusion of all the evidence and entered judgment in favor of defendant Property Management...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases