1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.Commw.
  4. 72 Pa.Commw.
  5. 72 Pa.Commw. 297 (1983)
 

WISSMAN v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.

Nos. 2977 C.D. 1981, 2978 C.D. 1981, 2979 C.D. 1981, 2980 C.D. 1981, 2981 C.D. 1981, 2982 C.D. 1981 and 2983 C.D. 1981.

72 Pa.Commw. 297 (1983)

George Wissman, Petitioner v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Respondent. Bensalem Township, Intervenor. Jeffrey Wissman, Petitioner v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Respondent. Bensalem Township, Intervenor. Timothy J. Donnelly, Petitioner v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Respondent. Bensalem Township, Intervenor. Arthur Witzel, Petitioner v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Respondent. Bensalem Township, Intervenor. Raymond Mari, Petitioner v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Respondent. Bensalem Township, Intervenor. Kenneth M. Danfield, Petitioner v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Respondent. Bensalem Township, Intervenor. George Hackert, Petitioner v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Respondent. Bensalem Township, Intervenor.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

February 23, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Philip Diefenderfer, Struckert, Yates & Krewson, for petitioners.

Henry F. Huhn, with him Leslie G. Dias, for intervenor.

No appearance for respondent.

Submitted on briefs December 15, 1982, to Judges ROGERS, CRAIG and MacPHAIL, sitting as a panel of three.

OPINION BY JUDGE ROGERS.

The seven appellants in these unemployment compensation cases which we have consolidated were discharged from their employment with the Bensalem Township Public Works Department for the use of narcotics and dangerous drugs during working hours.

The appellants were declared eligible for unemployment compensation benefits by the Office of Employment Security. The employer appealed these decisions, and separate hearings were held by a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases