1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 94 N.J.
  5. 94 N.J. 210 (1983)
 

STATE v. BRUZZESE

94 N.J. 210 (1983)

463 A.2d 320

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. JOSEPH P. BRUZZESE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided August 8, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank D. DeVito, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant (John H. Stamler, Union County Prosecutor, attorney).

Anthony D. Rinaldo, Jr., argued the cause for respondent (Rinaldo and Rinaldo, attorneys).

Mary L. Cupo, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for amicus curiae, Attorney General of the State of New Jersey (Irwin I. Kimmelman, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by GARIBALDI, J.

This case focuses upon the constitutionality of the seizure of evidence from an individual's home incident to the execution at his home of an outstanding arrest warrant on an unrelated charge. Specifically, the issue here is whether incriminating boots seized by police from defendant's bedroom in the course of arresting him on an unrelated contempt of court charge were admissible to prove defendant's involvement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases