1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 191 N.J.
  5. 191 N.J. Super. 109 (1983)
 

BISHOP v. HARSKI

191 N.J. Super. 109 (1983)

465 A.2d 577

MICHAEL BISHOP AND JOYCE BISHOP, HUSBAND AND WIFE, PLAINTIFFS, v. MARYANN HARSKI AND TADEUSZ HARSKI, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Camden County.

Decided May 13, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael A. Kaplan for plaintiffs (Tomar, Parks, Seliger, Simonoff & Adourian, attorneys).

Robert M. Kaplan for defendants (Yampell & Cosentino, attorneys).

ROSSETTI, J.S.C.

This case presents the novel question of whether the concept of additur/remittitur may be employed by a trial court on a motion for new trial following the liability verdict in a jurisdiction where liability and damages are routinely bifurcated.

Plaintiff stopped at a red light at a right angle intersection. When the light turned green, plaintiff proceeded for approximately 200 feet, at which...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases