1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 190 N.J.
  5. 190 N.J. Super. 92 (1983)
 

CONSOLIDATED PRECAST, INC. v. ACTION BUILDERS CO.

190 N.J. Super. 92 (1983)

461 A.2d 1214

CONSOLIDATED PRECAST, INC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ACTION BUILDERS CO., INC., COMMERCIAL CENTRE ASSOCIATES, LTD., LAN ASSOCIATES III, AND IRVING TRUST COMPANY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 22, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Victor A. Deutch argued the cause for appellants Commercial Centre Associates, Ltd. and Lan Associates III (Ravin, Davis & Sweet, attorneys; Jay J. Rice on the brief).

Richard L. Abramson argued the cause for respondent (Peckar & Abramson, attorneys).

Before Judges BISCHOFF, J.H. COLEMAN and GAULKIN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by BISCHOFF, P.J.A.D.

This appeal raises issues relating to the stop notice provisions of the Mechanics' Lien Law, N.J.S.A. 2A:44-75. The facts are essentially undisputed.

Defendant Lan Associates III ("Lan") is a Connecticut limited partnership formed for the purpose of exercising an option to purchase land on which certain buildings were to be erected. It presently owns one of the completed buildings. On October...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases