1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 93 N.J.
  5. 93 N.J. 143 (1983)
 

STATE v. APOSTOLIS

93 N.J. 143 (1983)

459 A.2d 1158

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MICHAEL J. APOSTOLIS AND NICHOLAS J. APOSTOLIS, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided May 16, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William B. Smith, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant (Richard S. Rebeck, Middlesex County Prosecutor, attorney).

Jane G. Kleinfeld, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for respondent Nicholas J. Apostolis (Joseph H. Rodriguez, Public Defender, attorney).

Jack Venturi argued the cause for respondent Michael J. Apostolis (Robert Bradley Blackman, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

This case raises the identical issue discussed in the companion case of State v. Valencia, 93 N.J. 126 (1983), namely, under what circumstances may a search conducted solely upon the authorization given by a judge over the telephone be considered valid.

On February 28, 1981 officers of the Edison Township Police Department conducted a narcotics raid leading to the arrest of a woman. In order to help the arrested...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases