1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 565 F.Supp.
  5. 565 F.Supp. 1553 (1983)
 

WETHERILL v. UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO

Nos. 77 C 1434, 77 C 2485.

565 F.Supp. 1553 (1983)

Rachel WETHERILL, Plaintiff, v. UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO and Eli Lilly and Company, Defendants. Maureen ROGERS, Plaintiff, v. UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO and Eli Lilly and Company, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

June 17, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul F. Stack, Mark D. DeBofsky, Stack & Filpi, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiffs.

Lane D. Bauer, Steven C. Parrish, Stephen E. Sheve, Shook, Hardy & Bacon, Kansas City, Mo., for defendant Eli Lilly and Co.

John Menk, John Menk & Associates, James W. Gladden, Jr., Judith Janssen, Mayer, Brown & Platt, Chicago, Ill., for defendant University of Chicago.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER*

SHADUR, District Judge.

Both Rachel Wetherill ("Wetherill") and Maureen Rogers ("Rogers") allege they were injured by exposure in utero to diethylstilbestrol ("DES"), manufactured and supplied by Eli Lilly and Company ("Lilly") and administered to plaintiffs' mothers as part of an experiment conducted by Dr. William Dieckmann ("Dieckmann") in the early 1950s at the University of Chicago (...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases