UNITED STATES v. UROQUIZA

No. 83 Cr. 698.

575 F.Supp. 1538 (1983)

UNITED STATES of America, v. Radamas Almaguer UROQUIZA, Raul Dieguez Rodriguez, Guillermo Bertoli, and Edwin Perez, a/k/a "Luis Perez," Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

December 28, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rudolph W. Giuliani, U.S. Atty., S.D. N.Y., New York City, for United States of America; Neil S. Cartusciello, Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City, of counsel.

Howard A. Jaffe, New York City, for defendant Edwin Perez.

Martin L. Schmukler, New York City, for defendant Raul Dieguez Rodriguez.

Lawrence Hochheiser, New York City, for defendant Guillermo Bertoli.

Robert Blossner, New York City, for defendant Radamas Almaguer Uroquiza.


OPINION

EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.

Defendant Edwin Perez ("Perez") moves to suppress evidence seized from his apartment pursuant to a search warrant and statements made by him during the search; for a trial separate from that of his three codefendants, Radamus Almaguer Uroquiza ("Uroquiza"), Raul Dieguez Rodriguez ("Rodriguez"), and Guillermo Bertoli ("Bertoli"); and for discovery and a bill of particulars. Perez is charged with conspiracy to distribute...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases