1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 566 F.Supp.
  5. 566 F.Supp. 1444 (1983)
 

OMNI OUTDOOR ADVERTISING v. COLUMBIA OUTDOOR

Civ. A. No. 82-2872-O.

566 F.Supp. 1444 (1983)

OMNI OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, INC., Plaintiff, v. COLUMBIA OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, INC., J. Willis Cantey and the City of Columbia, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Columbia Division.

July 8, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roy D. Bates and James S. Meggs, Columbia, S.C., for defendant City of Columbia.

Austin & Lewis by A. Camden Lewis and Randall Chastain, Columbia, S.C., for plaintiff.

OPINION

MacMAHON,* District Judge.

Defendant City of Columbia ("Columbia") moves to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, see Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), on the ground that it is exempt from liability under the federal antitrust laws and immune under state law. Plaintiff ("Omni") alleges that defendants have violated Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases