1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 567 F.Supp.
  5. 567 F.Supp. 1391 (1983)
 

RICHARDS v. MILESKI

Civ. A. No. 79-1837.

567 F.Supp. 1391 (1983)

Robert J. RICHARDS, Plaintiff, v. Milton S. MILESKI, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

July 21, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James E. Drew and Joseph Remcho, Robin B. Johansen, Kathleen J. Purcell and Barbara A. Brenner of Remcho & Johansen, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff.

Robert C. Seldon, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom Stanley S. Harris, U.S. Atty., and Royce C. Lamberth, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., were on the brief for defendants.

OPINION

CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment,1 plaintiff's opposition thereto, and the entire record herein. Defendants' motion raises two main questions: 1) Does the statute of limitations act as a bar to plaintiff's claim; and 2) Are defendants immune from prosecution? The Court concludes that the statute...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases