BEENEY v. HUSE

No. 77-3173-L-1; CA A23271.

671 P.2d 1207 (1983)

65 Or.App. 700

Lyle J. BEENEY, Appellant-Cross-Respondent, v. George M. HUSE and Tot Huse, Husband and Wife, Respondents-Cross-Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 23, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John R. Hanson, Medford, argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent. With him on the brief was Black & Hanson, Medford.

Kelly L. Anderson, Central Point, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents-cross-appellants.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

This case involves the sale of an 80-acre parcel of property, two easements and several buildings, including two storage sheds and a two-car garage located on one of the easements. We affirm as to all issues on the appeal. On cross-appeal, we remand to the trial court for a determination and award of attorney fees and affirm as to all other issues.

As to claims made under the 1976 real estate contract, the trial court entered judgment against defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases