MATTER OF MARRIAGE OF BARTER

No. 81-132-2; CA A23928.

671 P.2d 1188 (1983)

65 Or.App. 416

In the matter of the MARRIAGE OF Ernest F. BARTER, Respondent-Cross-Appellant, and Consuelo F. Barter, Appellant-Cross-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 9, 1983.

Reconsideration Denied December 23, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sidney Ainsworth, Ashland, argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent. On the brief were Jack Davis and Davis, Ainsworth, Pinnock, Davis & Gilstrap, P.C., Ashland.

Donald R. Crane, Klamath Falls, argued the cause for respondent-cross-appellant. With him on the brief was Crane & Bailey, Klamath Falls.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.


WARREN, Judge.

Wife appeals and husband cross-appeals from a decree dissolving their marriage. Wife assigns as error the trial court's valuation of husband's retirement plans, its property distribution and the amount and duration of spousal support. Husband asserts that the trial court erred in failing to consider jewelry that he alleged wife concealed from the court. Husband's cross-appeal lacks merit. Because we conclude that the trial court significantly undervalued...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases