1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 566 F.Supp.
  5. 566 F.Supp. 1254 (1983)
 

HADSELL v. FORD MOTOR CO.

No. C-1-82-618.

566 F.Supp. 1254 (1983)

Dale HADSELL, Plaintiff, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, W.D.

June 29, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William D. Haders, Cincinnati, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Daniel J. Hoffheimer, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Ford Motor Co.

Frederick G. Cloppert, Jr., Columbus, Ohio, for defendants.

SPIEGEL, District Judge.

This matter came on for consideration of the motion for reconsideration by plaintiff pro se (doc. 27) of this Court's Opinion and Order granting summary judgment to defendants Ford Motor Company (doc. 25) and UAW Local 863 (doc. 16). Memoranda in opposition have been filed by the defendants (docs. 29 and 31), to which a reply was filed by the plaintiff (doc. 30). For the following reasons, we conclude that plaintiff's motion for reconsideration...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases