1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.Commw.
  4. 71 Pa.Commw.
  5. 71 Pa.Commw. 110 (1983)
 

HARTMAN v. ST. BD. OF OPTOMETRICAL EXAM.

No. 2415 C.D. 1981.

71 Pa.Commw. 110 (1983)

Raymond M. Hartman, O.D., Petitioner v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, State Board of Optometrical Examiners, Respondent.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

January 11, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nicholas H. Krayer, for appellant.

Jerome Grossi, Assistant Counsel, with him James J. Kutz, Assistant Counsel, David F. Phifer, Chief Counsel, Jay Waldman, General Counsel, and LeRoy S. Zimmerman, Attorney General, for respondent.

Argued October 6, 1982, before Judges ROGERS, BLATT and CRAIG, sitting as a panel of three.

OPINION BY JUDGE BLATT, January 11, 1983:

Raymond M. Hartman, O.D., (appellant) appeals here from the 90-day suspension of his optometry license based on two violations of the Optometry Act1 (Act), namely the use of misleading advertising to the detriment of the general public and the failure to live up to the advertisements or make full refunds as guaranteed.

The facts may be briefly stated. Pursuant to complaints received by...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases