1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 558 F.Supp.
  5. 558 F.Supp. 1201 (1983)
 

TAMPIMEX OIL LTD. v. LATINA TRADING CORP.

No. 83 Civ. 1391 (RWS).

558 F.Supp. 1201 (1983)

TAMPIMEX OIL LIMITED, Plaintiff, v. LATINA TRADING CORPORATION, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

March 7, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Boulanger, Finley & Hicks, New York City (J. Portis Hicks, John J. Finley, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Breed, Abbott & Morgan, New York City (Melvin Goldstein, Hauppauge, David S. Patterson, New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER

LEVAL, District Judge.

Plaintiff obtained an ex parte order of attachment of more than $1,500,000 of the defendant's property held in a bank account in New York. Defendant moves to vacate that order, and to dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction and/or improper venue. Defendant's motions are denied.

I note as a preliminary matter that these motions have been submitted on an expedited basis and that the parties have had little...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases