1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 554 F.Supp.
  5. 554 F.Supp. 1029 (1983)
 

GOODMAN v. DeAZOULAY

Civ. A. No. 81-2550.

554 F.Supp. 1029 (1983)

Faye GOODMAN and Thelma Makavitt v. Daniel DeAZOULAY and Michael Levin.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

January 11, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven M. Kramer & Robert J. Vedatsky, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiffs.

Steven L. Friedman, Dilworth Paxon Kalish & Levy, Philadelphia, Pa., for Michael Levin.

Barry F. Greenberg, Philadelphia, Pa., for Daniel DeAzoulay.

MEMORANDUM and ORDER

SHAPIRO, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

In this action Faye Goodman ("Goodman") and Thelma Makavitt ("Makavitt") claim damages from Daniel DeAzoulay ("DeAzoulay") and Michael Levin ("Levin") arising out of their investment for the proposed development of real estate. They allege that defendants conspired to defraud them of the funds they invested by misrepresenting defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases