IN RE HARTMAN

No. 82-19.

2 Ohio St. 3d 154 (1983)

IN RE HARTMAN, ALLEGED JUVENILE TRAFFIC OFFENDER.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided January 5, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Stephen P. Gehres, for appellant.

Mr. Stephen E. Keister, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. Charles F. Koch, for appellee.


LOCHER, J.

We are presented with the following question for review: Does R.C. 2501.02 proscribe the appeal of juvenile court judgments and final orders rendered in juvenile traffic offender proceedings? In particular, this court must determine the import of the word "including" as used in the statute, for the disposition of the instant matter is clearly contingent upon the meaning herein ascribed to that term.

R.C. 2501.02(A) provides that the courts of appeals...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases