1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 566 F.Supp.
  5. 566 F.Supp. 945 (1983)
 

STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT BD. v. FLUOR CORP.

No. 76 Civ. 2135 (RWS).

566 F.Supp. 945 (1983)

STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT BOARD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FLUOR CORPORATION and Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

June 30, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Schwartz, Shapiro, Kelm & Warren, Columbus, Ohio, for plaintiff by Russell A. Kelm, Columbus, Ohio, of counsel.

Cahill, Gordon & Reindel, Fluor Corp., New York City, for defendants by Raymond L. Falls, Jr., Charles A. Gilman, John A. Shutkin, New York City, of counsel.

Kelley, Drye & Warren, New York City, for defendant Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. by Richard J. Concannon, Robert E. Crotty and Geraldine M. Boylan, New York City, of counsel.

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Defendants Fluor Corporation ("Fluor") and Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company ("Manufacturers") have moved for partial summary judgment limiting the class recovery in this securities fraud case and for summary judgment to dismiss the fourth amended complaint which includes a claim based on the transmission by Fluor to Manufacturers of certain alleged inside information (the "laundry list") alleged to be the subject of a conversation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases