1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 662 P.2d
  5. 662 P.2d 768 (1983)
 

HAAS v. PAINTER

No. A8011-06216; CA A24559.

662 P.2d 768 (1983)

62 Or.App. 719

Harl HAAS, Appellant, v. John PAINTER and Oregonian Publishing Company, an Oregon Corporation, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted October 11, 1982.

Reconsideration Denied June 10, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gerald R. Pullen, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Michael G. Holmes, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Richard S. Pope, and Spears, Lubersky, Campbell & Bledsoe, Portland.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.

BUTTLER, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff, a former Multnomah County District Attorney and the 1980 Democratic candidate for Attorney General, brought this action to recover damages to his reputation caused by an editorial published by defendants, which he contends was defamatory. He appeals from a judgment dismissing his complaint after defendants' motion for summary judgment1 was granted on the ground...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases