HOWES v. CURTIS

No. 13760.

661 P.2d 729 (1983)

104 Idaho 563

Anne T. HOWES, Plaintiff-Counter-defendant-Respondent, Cross-Appellant, v. Carl CURTIS, Defendant-Counter-claimant, Third-Party Plaintiff, Appellant and Cross-Respondent, v. James B. DONART, Third-Party Defendant and Respondent.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

March 24, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

E. Lee Schlender, Ketchum, for Carl Curtis.

Paul M. Beeks, of Smith & Beeks, Twin Falls, for Anne T. Howes.

John P. Howard, of Quane, Smith, Howard & Hull, Boise, for James B. Donart.


DONALDSON, Chief Justice.

The controversy which comes before the Court on this appeal had its beginning in a loan transaction involving the plaintiff, Anne T. Howes, and the defendant, Carl Curtis.

Howes, who owned a lounge in Hailey, Idaho, found herself in financial straits and needed to secure a loan of about $35,000.00. Howes arranged for a loan with Curtis, a self-professed mortgage banker, financier and real estate investor who had made similar loans...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases