STILL v. SAIF

WCB Nos. 80-03041, 80-01909; CA A26570.

671 P.2d 715 (1983)

65 Or.App. 501

In the matter of the Compensation of William M. Still, Claimant. William M. STILL, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent, v. STATE ACCIDENT INSURANCE FUND CORPORATION, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner, Peter Kiewit & Sons, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner-Cross-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 9, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Quintin B. Estell, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner-cross-respondent. With him on the briefs was Emmons, Kyle, Kropp & Kryger, P.C., Salem.

LaVonne Reimer, Portland, argued the cause for respondent-cross-petitioner-cross-respondent. With her on the brief was Lindsay, Hart, Neil & Weigler, Portland.

Darrell E. Bewley, Appellate Counsel, State Acc. Ins. Fund, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent-cross-petitioner.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.


ROSSMAN, Judge.

This is a workers' compensation case in which an appeal was filed by claimant and cross-appeals have been filed by the carrier for the first employer and by the second employer. We reverse on claimant's appeal and affirm on both cross-appeals.

The issue that must be decided first is contained in SAIF's cross-appeal. SAIF appeals the Board's order on reconsideration, which held that an aggravation had occurred and that, therefore, SAIF was responsible...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases