1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 660 P.2d
  5. 660 P.2d 698 (1983)
 

AUSTIN v. DANFORD

80-1087-L, CA A23441.

660 P.2d 698 (1983)

62 Or.App. 242

Penny AUSTIN & Alan Bergstrom, wife and husband, Appellants, v. David DANFORD & Kristina Danford, husband and wife, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 16, 1983.

Reconsideration Allowed May 25, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carlyle F. Stout, III, Medford, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief was Grant, Ferguson & Carter, Medford.

James H. Smith, Medford, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Grantland, Smith & Grensky, Medford.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.

WARREN, Judge.

Plaintiffs (tenants) brought an action against defendants (landlords) under the Residential Landlord and Tenant Act. ORS 91.700 to 91.895. Tenants alleged that landlords (1) failed to maintain the rented premises in a habitable condition, (2) deliberately refused or were grossly negligent in failing to provide an essential service and (3) engaged in retaliatory conduct by threatening to bring an action to evict tenants. The trial court entered judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases