SCHULTZ v. BARBERTON GLASS CO.

No. 82-316.

4 Ohio St. 3d 131 (1983)

SCHULTZ, APPELLANT, v. BARBERTON GLASS COMPANY, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided April 13, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Scanlon & Gearinger Co., L.P.A., Mr. Bradford M. Gearinger and Mr. Mark Hilkert, for appellant.

Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs Co., L.P.A., and Mr. Donald A. Powell, for appellee.


CELEBREZZE, C.J.

The issue raised in this appeal is whether a contemporaneous physical injury is a necessary condition precedent to liability for the negligent infliction of serious emotional distress. For the reasons which follow, we conclude that a contemporaneous physical injury is unnecessary.

In 1908, Ohio adopted the rule which requires the finding of contemporaneous physical injury before any recovery can be obtained for fright, shock, emotional distress...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases