1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 576 F.Supp.
  5. 576 F.Supp. 676 (1983)
 

AIRWELD, INC. v. AIRCO, INC.

Civ. No. 80-356-RE.

576 F.Supp. 676 (1983)

AIRWELD, INC., Plaintiff, v. AIRCO, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Oregon.

January 12, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. David Sheppard, Ferguson & Burdell, Seattle, Wash., Henry A. Carey, Portland, Or., for plaintiff.

Thomas M. Triplett, David W. Axelrod, Schwabe, Williamson, Wyatt, Moore & Roberts, Portland, Or., W. Foster Wollen, Joan Caridi, Robert S. Fischler, Shearman & Sterling, New York City, for defendant.

OPINION

REDDEN, District Judge:

Defendant Airco moves for judgment N.O.V. after a jury verdict against it on antitrust claims brought by plaintiff Airweld. I grant the motion on the grounds that the plaintiff's evidence was insufficient to support the verdict. In this opinion, I will briefly recount the relevant facts and law, and then indicate in my discussion of the evidence presented to the jury the crucial gaps in plaintiff's case.

FACTS

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases