1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 704 F.2d
  5. 704 F.2d 501 (1983)
 

CAMPBELL v. JOINT DIST. 28-J

Nos. 81-1701, 81-1702.

704 F.2d 501 (1983)

Roxanna CAMPBELL, William Orr, Alden Kautz, John Grandbouche, Don Turner, William Johnson and Roy Peister, Plaintiffs-Appellees, and Mountain States Legal Foundation, Plaintiff in Intervention-Appellee, v. JOINT DISTRICT 28-J of the Counties of Adams and Arapahoe, Aurora, Colorado; The City of Aurora, and the following individuals: Doyle K. Seawright, Douglas A. Johnson, Wm. Davis, DeWitte C. Gordon, and John G. Stuart, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

April 8, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bruce W. Sattler, Holland & Hart, Denver, Colo. (Anne J. Castle, Holland & Hart, Denver, Colo., with him on the brief), for defendant-appellant Joint District 28-J.

Marc F. Colin, Asst. City Atty., Aurora, Colo. (Patrick E. Kowaleski, Aurora, Colo., with him on brief), for defendant-appellant City of Aurora.

Gale A. Norton, Denver, Colo. (Roger J. Marzulla and David Dominick, William H. Mellor III, Denver, Colo., with her on brief), for plaintiff in intervention-appellee, Mountain States Legal Foundation.

Roy Peister, pro se (Roxanna Campbell, Denver, Colo., William Orr, Aurora, Colo., Alden Kautz, Littleton, Colo., John Grandbouche, Lakewood, Colo., Don Turner, Denver, Colo., William Johnson, Littleton, Colo., with him on brief), for plaintiffs-appellees.

Before McWILLIAMS, DOYLE and LOGAN, Circuit Judges.

WILLIAM E. DOYLE, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is from a final order dated May 19, 1981 by the United States District Court for the District of Colorado (summary judgment in favor of the appellees here). The trial court held that defendants' expenditures of public funds in connection with a referendum proposal were unauthorized and unlawful. The court further required reimbursement of those funds through the school districts and cities, from whose treasuries the funds...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases