1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 574 F.Supp.
  5. 574 F.Supp. 619 (1983)
 

VIOLA SPORTSWEAR, INC. v. MIMUN

No. 82 Civ. 3783.

574 F.Supp. 619 (1983)

VIOLA SPORTSWEAR, INC., Plaintiff, v. Claude Clement MIMUN, Claude Clement, Ltd., CCM Holding Corporation, Men's Sportswear, Inc., United Soneli of America, Ltd., Arnold Apparel Manufacturing Co., Inc., and Paul Raguel, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. New York.

November 15, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Netter, Dowd & Alfieri, New York City, Locke, Purnell, Boren, Laney & Neely, Dallas, Tex., for plaintiff.

Proskauer, Rose, Goetz & Mendelsohn, New York City, for all defendants other than Arnold Apparel.

Ralph J. Schwarz, Jr., New York City, Gardere & Wynne, Dallas, Tex., for defendant Arnold Apparel.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

GLASSER, District Judge:

An action was commenced in which the plaintiff alleged trademark infringement, deception and unfair competition by the defendants. All of the defendants with the exception of Arnold Apparel Manufacturing Co., Inc. (hereinafter the "moving defendants") moved for summary judgment. The statement attached to the moving papers pursuant to General Rule 9(g) state the material facts, which were not controverted, to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases