1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 95 N.J.
  5. 95 N.J. 18 (1983)
 

IN RE TUMINI

95 N.J. 18 (1983)

468 A.2d 707

IN THE MATTER OF ALFONSO A. TUMINI, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

December 5, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robyn M. Hill argued the cause for the Division of Ethics and Professional Services.

Michael A. DeFino, a member of the Pennsylvania Bar, and admitted by the Board to appear pro hac vice on motion of Robert A. Gelinas, argued the cause for respondent.

ORDER

This matter coming before the Supreme Court on an order to show cause why ALFONSO A. TUMINI of WEST BERLIN should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined on the basis of his disbarment in the State of Pennsylvania, and good cause appearing

It is ORDERED that the report of the Disciplinary Review Board recommending that the respondent be disbarred is hereby adopted; and it is further

ORDERED that ALFONSO...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases