1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 579 F.Supp.
  5. 579 F.Supp. 510 (1983)
 

IN RE WHEAT RAIL FREIGHT RATE ANTITRUST LITIGATION

MDL No. 534.

579 F.Supp. 510 (1983)

In re WHEAT RAIL FREIGHT RATE ANTITRUST LITIGATION. This Document Relates to: Pillsbury Co., No. 82 C 6054; General Mills, Inc., No. 83 C 834; DCA Food Industries, Inc., No. 83 C 835; Pillsbury Co., No. 83 C 1450.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

December 8, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard J. Wegener, Minneapolis, Minn., for Pillsbury.

Ross L. Thorfinnson, Hopkins, Minn., for General Mills.

James R. Scoggin, Hopkins, Minn., for DCA Food Industries.

Laurence Z. Shiekman, Deborah F. Cohen, Philip H. Lebowitz, Pepper, Hamilton & Scheetz, Philadelphia, Pa., for Consol. Rail.

Charles C. Rettberg, Jr., Harry N. Babcock, Paul R. Hitchcock, Rachel E. Geiersbach, Cleveland, Ohio, for Baltimore & Ohio and Chesapeake & Ohio.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PRENTICE H. MARSHALL, District Judge.

This memorandum opinion concerns plaintiffs' motions to dismiss counterclaims filed by several of the defendants in these antitrust actions. The defendants ("railroads") are railroads over which the plaintiffs ("shippers") have shipped wheat and wheat products. The railroads1 allege that they are among the victims of collusive...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases