1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 565 F.Supp.
  5. 565 F.Supp. 476 (1983)
 

KIMMEL v. PETERSON

Civ. A. No. 82-2752.

565 F.Supp. 476 (1983)

Murray H. KIMMEL, et al. v. Carl John PETERSON, et al.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

As Modified May 27, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David B. Zlotnick, Greenfield & Chimicles, P.C., Bala Cynwyd, Pa., for plaintiff.

Daniel Segal, Claire Rocco and Leslie Hayes, Goodman & Ewing, Philadelphia, Pa., for Carl John Peterson.

Melvin Simensky, Gersten, Scherer & Kaplowitz, New York City, David Braveman, Philadelphia, Pa., for Raymond and Jessie Dirks.

Raymond J. DeRaymond, Coffin, DeRaymond, Shipman, Stitt, Lewis & Walters, Easton, Pa., for Mario Andretti.

MEMORANDUM

GILES, District Judge.

Various defendants have filed motions to dismiss the amended complaint in this action. For the reasons which follow, their motions shall be granted in part and denied in part.

This now complex securities fraud case had rather humble beginnings. On June 25, 1982, Murray Kimmel filed a four page, two count complaint against John Peterson, alleging a violation of section...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases