1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 669 P.2d
  5. 669 P.2d 361 (1983)
 

STATE v. DENDURENT

No. DUC-3776; CA A27002.

669 P.2d 361 (1983)

64 Or.App. 575

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. William Dean DENDURENT, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 21, 1983.

Reconsideration Denied October 28, 1983.

Review Denied November 15, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roger Hennagin, Lake Oswego, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Thomas H. Denney, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and William F. Gary, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before GILLETTE, P.J., and WARDEN and YOUNG, JJ.

WARDEN, Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction for DUII. He contends that he should have been considered for diversion under ORS 484.445 et seq. He assigns as error the trial court ruling that he had the burden to prove his eligibility for diversion by showing that the present DUII offense did not involve "an accident required to be reported under ORS 483.606," the trial court's denial of his petition for diversion and the trial court's enforcement of ORS...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases