STATE v. BURBANK

No. 8228SC345.

297 S.E.2d 602 (1982)

STATE of North Carolina v. William F. BURBANK.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

November 16, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Asst. Atty. Gen. Guy A. Hamlin, Raleigh, for the State.

Riddle, Shackleford & Hyler, P.A. by George B. Hyler, Jr., Asheville, for defendant-appellant.


BECTON, Judge.

The defendant brings forth five assignments of error and makes three arguments on appeal.

I

Defendant first argues that the outcome of his trial was adversely affected by the District Attorney's examination of a defense witness concerning his (the District Attorney's) I.D. card which was not in evidence at the time; by the exhibition of the card to the jury during the trial; and by his showing the card to the jury during final argument...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases