1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 456 U.S.
  5. 456 U.S. 430 (1982)
 

O'DELL v. ESPINOZA

No. 81-534.

456 U.S. 430 (1982)

102 S.Ct. 1865

72 L.Ed.2d 237

O'DELL ET AL. v. ESPINOZA, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ESPINOZA AND AS GUARDIAN, ET AL.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided May 3, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Theodore S. Halaby argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Louis B. Bruno and David Neil.

Scott H. Robinson argued the cause and filed a brief for respondents.*

PER CURIAM.

Under 28 U. S. C. § 1257, this Court has jurisdiction to review only "[f]inal judgments or decrees rendered by the highest court of a State in which a decision could be had." Because the Colorado Supreme Court remanded this case for trial, its decision is not final "as an effective determination of the litigation." Market Street R. Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of Cal., 324 U.S. 548, 551 (1945). Although there...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases