TATE v. YENOIR

Civ. No. 81-10015.

537 F.Supp. 306 (1982)

Harold TATE, Plaintiff, v. Charles YENOIR, Defendant.

United States District Court, E. D. Michigan, N. D.

April 5, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark J. Brissette, Bay City, Mich., for plaintiff.

A. T. Lippert, Jr., Saginaw, Mich., for defendant Arenac County.

Owen Cummings, Livonia, Mich., for defendants Sheriff's Dept. and Yenoir.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JAMES HARVEY, District Judge.

Stated generally, the question before the Court is what, if any, constitutional protection is afforded an undersheriff when he is subpoenaed to testify in a criminal trial as a rebuttal witness and testifies for the defendant and against the state and fellow undersheriffs. Plaintiff was fired as a result of his testimony. Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff claims his firing unlawfully deprived...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases