1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 650 P.2d
  5. 650 P.2d 188 (1982)
 

VAN SANT v. YAMHILL COUNTY

LUBA 81-100; CA A23766.

650 P.2d 188 (1982)

59 Or.App. 127

Lester VAN SANT, Petitioner, v. YAMHILL COUNTY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 8, 1982.

Reconsideration Denied October 14, 1982.

Review Denied November 2, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lester Van Sant, filed the brief pro se for petitioner.

N. Robert Shields, Asst. County Counsel, McMinnville, filed the brief for respondent.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner has not sustained his burden on any of the contentions raised in his pro se brief. His strongest argument would seem to be that, if his application for a variance is treated as one for nonconforming lot status enabling a dwelling to be built on his property, his 5.44-acre parcel was a "lawful existing lot" or nonconforming "lot of record" at the time section 37200 of the Yamhill County Zoning Ordinance was enacted.

Under the circumstances...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases