1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 449 A.2d
  5. 449 A.2d 329 (1982)
 

STINSON v. MUELLER

No. 81-434.

449 A.2d 329 (1982)

Charles STINSON, Appellant, v. Charles F. MUELLER, Appellee.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided August 5, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Judith L. Gorfkle, Washington, D. C., for appellant.

John B. Sorrell, Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before NEWMAN, Chief Judge, and NEBEKER and BELSON, Associate Judges.

NEWMAN, Chief Judge:

On the basis that appellant's breach of contract claim was barred by the defense of accord and satisfaction, the trial court granted appellee's motion to dismiss. Because proof of a valid accord and satisfaction is lacking, we reverse.

I

In accordance with numerous oral agreements and one written contract, appellant Stinson made a series of payments to appellee Mueller to perform specified...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases