OPINION
McCORMICK, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of aggravated robbery and punishment, enhanced by a prior felony conviction, was assessed at confinement for life. Appellant does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction.
In a supplemental brief filed by counsel and in a pro se brief, appellant contends that the court's charge is fundamentally defective as in Evans v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.