SILLER v. HARTZ MOUNTAIN ASSOCIATES


184 N.J. Super. 442 (1982)

443 A.2d 547

SIDNEY SILLER AND SHIRLEY SILLER, HIS WIFE; IRVING GAINES AND CORALIE J. GAINES, HIS WIFE; MARSHALL NATAPOFF AND JANET NATAPOFF, HIS WIFE; FRANCIS CLARK AND LUCILLE CLARK, HIS WIFE; AND JOEL KRAMER, SINGLE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, AND HARMON COVE CONDOMINIUM II ASSOCIATION, INC., PLAINTIFF-INTERVENOR-RESPONDENT, v. HARTZ MOUNTAIN ASSOCIATES, A CORPORATION; HARMON COVE I CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., A CORPORATION; AND HARMON COVE RECREATION ASSOCIATION, INC., A CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 28, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Tomasin argued the cause for appellants.

Jerome A. Vogel argued the cause for defendant-respondent Hartz Mountain Industries Inc. (Jeffer, Hopkinson & Vogel, attorneys).

Richard S. Miller argued the cause for defendants-respondents Harmon Cove I Condominium Association, Inc. and Harmon Cove Recreation Association Inc. (Williams, Caliri, Miller, Otley & Horn, attorneys).

Before Judges ALLCORN, FRANCIS and MORTON I. GREENBERG.


PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Chancery Division is affirmed essentially for the reasons set forth by Judge Gaulkin in his opinion published in 173 N.J. Super. ___ (1981).

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases