1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 548 F.Supp.
  5. 548 F.Supp. 66 (1982)
 

WETHERILL v. UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO

Nos. 77 C 1434, 77 C 2485.

548 F.Supp. 66 (1982)

Rachel WETHERILL, Plaintiff, v. UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO and Eli Lilly and Company, Defendants. Maureen ROGERS, Plaintiff, v. UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO and Eli Lilly and Company, Defendants.

United States District Court, N. D. Illinois, E. D.

September 10, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul F. Stack, Mark D. DeBofsky, Stack & Filpi, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiffs.

Richard C. Bartelt, Wildman, Harrold, Allen & Dixon, Chicago, Ill., Lane D. Bauer, Steven C. Parrish, Shook, Hardy & Bacon, Kansas City, Mo., John Cadwalader Menk, John Cadwalader Menk & Ass'n, Chicago, Ill., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, District Judge.

In these diversity actions Rachel Wetherill ("Wetherill") and Maureen Rogers ("Rogers") allege they were injured by exposure in utero to the drug diethylstilbestrol ("DES"), manufactured and supplied by Eli Lilly and Company ("Lilly") and administered experimentally to their mothers when obstetrical patients at a hospital operated by the University of Chicago ("University"). Each of Wetherill and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases