1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 537 F.Supp.
  5. 537 F.Supp. 77 (1982)
 

CUSTOM AUTOMATED MACHINERY v. PENDA CORP.

Nos. 79 C 1755, 79 C 3078.

537 F.Supp. 77 (1982)

CUSTOM AUTOMATED MACHINERY, a Division of Custom Aluminum Products, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter Defendant, v. PENDA CORPORATION, Defendant-Counter Plaintiff. PENDA CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. CUSTOM AUTOMATED MACHINERY, Defendant.

United States District Court, N. D. Illinois, E. D.

January 20, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul Frenz, McBride, Baker, Wienke & Schlosser, Oak Brook, Ill., for plaintiff-counter defendant.

William F. Conlon, Sidley & Austin, Chicago, Ill., for defendant-counter plaintiff.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

ASPEN, District Judge:

This cause having come on trial and the Court, having considered the evidence, oral arguments, and the briefs of the parties, does hereby make and enter, pursuant to Rule 52 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. Any finding of fact which is properly a conclusion of law and any conclusion of law which is properly a finding of fact is to be so considered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases